THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TEDDIE G. WATSON and JEFFREY L. ORTH
____________
Appeal No. 1998-3003
Application No. 08/589,6211
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed January 22, 1996.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/910,635, filed July 8, 1992, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,485,697, which was a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/837,662, filed February 14, 1992, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,237,771, which was a continuation of Application
No. 07/715,730, filed June 17, 1991, now abandoned, which was
a continuation of Application No. 07/587,251, filed September
24, 1990, now abandoned, which was a continuation of
Application No. 07/354,917, filed May 22, 1989, now U.S.
Patent No. 4,960,437.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007