Ex parte BOUCHER - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 98-3354                                                                                       Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/427,743                                                                                                             


                 the only other claim remaining in the application, has been                                                                            
                 indicated as being allowable subject to the requirement that it                                                                        
                 be rewritten to include all the subject matter of the claims                                                                           
                 from which it depends.                                                                                                                 
                          The appellant's invention pertains to a fishing lure                                                                          
                 comprising a soft body that is flexible and resilient.                                                                                 
                 Independent claim 21 is further illustrative of the appealed                                                                           
                 subject matter and a copy thereof may be found in APPENDIX A of                                                                        
                 the brief.                                                                                                                             
                          The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                 
                 Guzik                                        4,345,399                                    Aug. 24, 1982                                
                 Salminen                                     5,090,151                                    Feb. 25, 1992                                
                          The claims on appeal stand rejected in the following                                                                          
                 manner:3                                                                                                                               
                          (1) Claims 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                                                        
                 anticipated by Guzik;                                                                                                                  
                          (2) Claims 23, 24 and 28-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                                                       
                 being unpatentable over Guzik; and                                                                                                     

                          3The final rejection of claims 21-28 under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                        
                 112, second paragraph, was deemed by the examiner to have been                                                                         
                 overcome by the above-noted amendment after final rejection                                                                            
                 (see the advisory action mailed on August 28, 1996 (Paper No.                                                                          
                 6)).                                                                                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007