Appeal No. 98-3354 Page 8
Application No. 08/427,743
1990), Specialty Composites v. Cabot Corp., 845 F.2d 981, 986,
6 USPQ2d 1601, 1604 (Fed. Cir. 1988) and In re Sneed, 710 F.2d
1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983)). Here, we can
think of no circumstances under which the artisan, consistent
with the appellant's specification, would construe the
resilient, elastic member 60 of Guzik to correspond to the
claimed weight.
With respect to claims 25-27, 34, 35 and 37, we have
carefully reviewed the teachings of Salminen but find nothing
therein which would overcome the deficiencies of Guzik that we
have noted above.
The examiner's rejections are all reversed.
REVERSED
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007