THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM A. MILLWARD
and JOHN DABINETT
____________
Appeal No. 1998-3427
Application No. 08/442,1091
____________
HEARD: September 14, 1999
____________
Before PATE, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 31 through 46, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. Claims 1 through 30 have been
canceled.
The appellants’ invention relates to a method of making a
composite pipe. An understanding of the invention can be
1Application for patent filed May 16, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007