Ex parte SPIEVACK - Page 1





                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                Paper No. 20                            

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           

                                                     Ex parte ALAN R. SPIEVACK                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                          Appeal No. 1999-0098                                                                          
                                                    Application No. 08/328,4431                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           

                 Before CALVERT, CRAWFORD, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                                                                          
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4                                                                     
                 to 6, 11, 14 to 42, 44 and 45.  The other claims in the                                                                                
                 application, claims 2, 3, 7 to 10, 12, 13, 43 and 46 to 58,                                                                            


                          1Application for patent filed October 25, 1994.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007