THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL PY
____________
Appeal No. 99-0184
Application No. 08/567,5101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 9 through 15. Claims 1 through 8, the
other claims pending in this application, have been allowed.2
1Application filed December 5, 1995, for reissue of U.S.
Patent No. 5,267,986 (Application No. 07/863,943, filed April
6, 1992).
2It appears to us that claims 2 and 3 should be made to
be dependent on claim 6 to provide antecedent basis for "the
finger."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007