Appeal No. 99-0184 Page 9
Application No. 08/567,510
claims 1 through 6 were drawn to the cartridge per se,
original patent claims 7 and 8 were drawn to the combination
of a cartridge with a dispenser. Accordingly, it is clear to
us the examiner's rejection of claims 9 through 14 is in
error.
For the reasons stated above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 9 through 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 251
is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007