THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WEI H. CHENG ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0284 Application No. 08/721,6661 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before NASE, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1 and 9, as amended subsequent to the final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE. 1Application for patent filed September 27, 1996.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007