Ex parte CHENG - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 11                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Ex parte WEI H. CHENG                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-0284                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/721,6661                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before NASE, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to                                                                         
                 allow claims 1 and 9, as amended subsequent to the final                                                                               
                 rejection.  These claims constitute all of the claims pending                                                                          
                 in this application.                                                                                                                   


                          We REVERSE.                                                                                                                   

                          1Application for patent filed September 27, 1996.                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007