Appeal No. 1999-0284 Page 2 Application No. 08/721,666 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a semiconductor wafer carrier fork cover. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Harada et al. (Harada) 5,217,340 June 8, 1993 Claims 1 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Harada. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 10, mailed May 8, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellant's brief (Paper No. 9, filed March 16, 1998) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007