Ex parte CHENG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0284                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/721,666                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a semiconductor                   
          wafer carrier fork cover.  An understanding of the invention                
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which                   
          appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                           


               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Harada et al. (Harada)   5,217,340                June 8, 1993              



               Claims 1 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          being anticipated by Harada.                                                


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                 
          rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper                
          No. 10, mailed May 8, 1998) for the examiner's complete                     
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellant's               
          brief (Paper No. 9, filed March 16, 1998) for the appellant's               
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007