THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SAMUEL S. PRATT, DAN SHAFFER, TIM A. DAVIS,
ASHLEY HEIPLE and PETER N. LALOS
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0616
Application 08/443,1521
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before COHEN, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-10, 12 and 13. Claims 11 and 14-27, the
only other remaining claims in the application, stand
withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)
1Application for patent filed May 17, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007