THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BENJAMIN L. GARFINKLE
____________
Appeal No. 99-0618
Application No. 08/797,4961
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, 6 and 15, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed February 7, 1997. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/462,953, filed June 5, 1995, now abandoned.
2Claims 1, 4 and 7 through 14 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007