THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARRY S. MAY
____________
Appeal No. 99-0622
Application No. 08/637,7171
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 25 through 39 and 41 through 55, which are
all of the claims pending in this application. The examiner2
1National stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international
Application PCT/GB94/02719, filed December 13, 1994, which claims priority
under 35 U.S.C. §§ 119(a) and 365(b) based on United Kingdom Application
9325508.1, filed December 14, 1993.
2Claim 40 was canceled and claims 42 and 52 were amended in the
amendment after final filed June 12, 1998 with the appeal brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007