THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAY M. HENRIOTT ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0632 Application No. 08/744,6921 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 9 through 12. Claims 4 through 7 and 13, the only other claims pending in this application, have been indicated as allowable by the examiner. Application for patent filed November 7, 1996. According to the1 appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 08/391,422, filed February 16, 1995, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007