Ex parte HENRIOTT - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0632                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/744,692                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a desk system                     
          comprising a work surface, a cabinet disposed over the work                 
          surface and having a plurality of connected panels defining a               
          cabinet interior, and a support structure including support                 
          stanchions extending upwardly completely through the work                   
          surface and completely through a lower panel of the cabinet.                
          The cabinet is fixedly attached to the upper end portions of                
          the stanchions.   A copy of the claims on appeal is contained2                                                            
          in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Friedman                      3,125,385                Mar. 17,             
          1964                                                                        
          Boundy et al. (Boundy)        4,762,072                Aug.  9,             
          1988                                                                        
          Simonton et al. (Simonton)    5,130,494                Jul. 14,             
          1992                                                                        


               It appears to us that the appellant's Figure 2 may be inconsistent2                                                                     
          with other portions of the appellant's disclosure in that the portions (50) of
          the stanchions (48) do not appear to be illustrated in Figure 2 as extending
          through the cabinet bottom (64) and into the cabinet interior; only the cover
          plate (56) seems to be illustrated within the cabinet interior.  Figure 3 and
          page 5, lines 17-24, of the specification, on the other hand, suggest that the
          portions (50) extend through the cabinet bottom into the cabinet interior.  
          The examiner may wish to address this issue in the event of any further     
          prosecution.                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007