THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TERESA M. OKONSKY
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0636
Application No. 08/828,3751
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 7 through 10, 16, 18, 20, 21 and 24
through 28. Claims 26 and 27 were amended (see Paper No. 20
and Paper No. 21) after the final rejection. Claims 1 through
Application for patent filed March 28, 1997. According to the1
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/391,546,
filed February 21, 1995, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007