Ex parte OKONSKY - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0636                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/828,375                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to an expandable                     
          partition kit or gate assembly which is adapted to be mounted,              
          in one embodiment, into a wall or, in another embodiment, onto              
          a finished wall.  The assembly includes a housing for storing               
          the expandable gate in collapsed form.  The expandable gate                 
          may be in the form of an accordion gate (2), as illustrated in              
          Figures 1, 2 and 5 or a rollable netting/fabric/material                    
          stored on a spool within the housing, as illustrated in                     
          Figures 6 through 8.  A copy of the claims on appeal is                     
          contained in the appendix to the appellant's brief.2                        
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Martinek                      1,882,331           Oct. 11, 1932             
          La Mell et al. (La Mell)           4,160,972           Jul. 10,             
          1979                                                                        
          Johnston                      4,821,786           Apr. 18, 1989             
               A reference made of record by this panel of the Board is:              
          Christison                    2,455,112           Nov. 30, 1948             
               The following rejections are before us for review.                     


               The copy of claim 20 in the appendix is an inaccurate reproduction of2                                                                     
          the claim of record in that, in line 4, "than" should be "that."            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007