Appeal No. 1999-0636 Page 18 Application No. 08/828,375 commensurate in scope with the preambles of these claims, which recite an "expandable partition kit" or "expandable gate assembly"? The kit or assembly as disclosed would not appear to us to include the wall or wall surface. (c) Would one of ordinary skill in the art understand what is meant by the language "expandable about an axis" as recited in claim 21? (2) Is the subject matter of claims 7-10, 16, 18, 20 and 24- 28 supported by the appellant's original disclosure, as filed on February 21, 1995 as Application No. 08/391,546, in compliance with the written description requirement of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112? In particular: (a) Is the limitation "expandable at an acute angle" in claim 20 (and incorporated by all claims depending therefrom) adequately supported in the appellant's original disclosure? (b) Does the appellant's original disclosure provide adequate support for the gate height of "less than approximately 50 inches" recited in claim 25 (and incorporated by all claims depending therefrom)? (3) Does Christison (U.S. Patent No. 2,455,112, issued November 30, 1948) anticipate the subject matter of any of thePage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007