Ex parte PALUSIS et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 99-0650                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/726,978                                                                                                                                            


                     examiner.  Claims 4-6, the only other claims remaining in the                                                                                                     
                     application, have been indicated by the examiner as being                                                                                                         
                     allowable if rewritten in independent form to include all the                                                                                                     
                     limitations of base claim 1 and any intervening claim.                                                                                                            
                                Appellants’ invention pertains to a fastener for                                                                                                       
                     insertion through aligned holes in two composite sheets to                                                                                                        
                     hold the sheets together.  Independent claim 8, a copy of                                                                                                         
                     which can be found in an appendix to appellants’ brief, is                                                                                                        
                     illustrative of the appealed subject matter.                                                                                                                      
                                The references relied upon by the examiner in support of                                                                                               
                     rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                                                                                                      
                                Cramer Jr. et al (Cramer)                                       4,790,683                                  Dec. 13,                                    
                     1988                                                                                                                                                              
                                K.A.C. Limited                2                                 1,167,899                                  Dec.  2,                                    
                     1958                                                                                                                                                              
                                Claims 1-3 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                                                                                               
                     as being anticipated by French ‘899.                                                                                                                              


                                2Our understanding of this French language reference is                                                                                                
                     derived from a translation thereof submitted by appellants                                                                                                        
                     during prosecution of the instant application.  As indicated                                                                                                      
                     by the translation, this patent appears to have been filed in                                                                                                     
                     the French Patent Office on behave of the inventor by K.A.C.                                                                                                      
                     Limited.  In order to avoid confusion as to the reference                                                                                                         
                     intended, we will continue to use the designation French ‘899                                                                                                     
                     used by the examiner in referring to this reference.                                                                                                              
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007