Appeal No. 1999-0718
Application 08/594,149
The prior art references of record relied upon by
the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Carley 568,237 Sept. 22, 1896
Donnelly D-26,777 Mar. 16, 1897
Hanneman 2,116,928 May 10, 1938
Williams 2,607,988 Aug. 26, 1952
Carter 2,777,724 Jan. 15, 1957
Eramo 3,464,731 Sept. 2, 1969
Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by either Hanneman or Eramo.
Claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Carter.
Claims 1 and 4 additionally stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Donnelly in view of
Carley.
Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Donnelly in view of Carley as
applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Williams.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007