Ex parte WHITNEY - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-0718                                                        
          Application 08/594,149                                                      



          indefinite.  Our reasoning for the above determination fol-                 
          lows.                                                                       


                    Before addressing an examiner's rejections based on               
          prior art, it is an essential prerequisite that the claimed                 
          subject matter be fully understood.  Accordingly, we initially              
          direct our attention to appellant's independent claim 1 on                  
          appeal in an attempt to derive an understanding of the scope                
          and content thereof.                                                        


                    Claim 1 is directed to a material handling grip                   
          comprising a handhold shaped on a first side to accommodate                 
          the                                                                         
          fingers and thumb of a partially closed hand, with said hand-               
          hold                                                                        


          further having a generally flat surface opposite said first                 
          side. Claim 1 goes on to recite “said flat surface having a                 
          uniform thickness and offset from said first side.”  The                    
          material handling grip of claim 1 is indicated as further                   

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007