Appeal No. 1999-0880
Application No. 08/700,610
control pointer 23 of Figure 2. Accordingly, although, in our
view, the decision comes down to one word, viz., “load,”
appearing in a box in the flow diagram of Figure 3, that is
enough to establish adequate support for the now claimed
“processor controlled code location pointer” and
“software controlled code location pointer” as it shows that
the inventors had possession of a processor controlled code
location pointer, in addition to the mechanical code location
pointer 23 of Figure 2, at the time the application was
originally filed. Thus, we will reverse the rejections of
claims 20 through 45 under 35 U.S.C. § 251 and 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph.
We have reversed all outstanding rejections of the
instant claims. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is
reversed.
REVERSED
Errol A. Krass )
Administrative Patent Judge )
15
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007