Paper No. 24
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MILTON G. MUTCHNICK
______________
Appeal No. 1999-1236
Application 07/571,7821
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, LORIN and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1,
2
3 through 5 and 9 through 18, all the claims pending in the application.
1 Application for patent filed August 24, 1990.
2 Notwithstanding entry authorization by the examiner annotated on the amendment
filed January 8, 1997 (Paper No. 19), claim 8 has not been cancelled per appellant's
request. This clearical oversite should be corrected upon return of the above identified
application to the jurisdiction of the examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007