Appeal No. 1999-1488 Application 08/630,332 (medium) 22 in the tray being fed through passages 24, 25, by roller 23. When the paper sheets contact sensor means (feeler) 18a in the feed passage, the feeler 18 enters slit 17 in the tray, to prevent removal (opening) of the tray. As for claim 7, indicator 35 lights to indicate the presence of paper in the feed passage (page 11, last line, to page 12, line 7). The only element recited in claim 1 which is not disclosed by Okamoto is a stacker, but as discussed above in connection with rejection (1), Suzuki discloses stacker 63 (collection tray) in a copier, such being a well known feature which would obviously have been provided in the copier of Okamoto. Conclusion The examiner's decision to reject claims 1 to 8 is reversed. Claims 1 to 7 are rejected pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b). This decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007