Ex parte KACINES - Page 15




          Appeal No. 1999-1747                                      Page 15           
          Application No. 08/715,422                                                  


          35 U.S.C. § 103 without resorting to speculation and                        
          conjecture as to the scope of claim 1.  This being the case,                
          we are therefore constrained to reverse the examiner's                      
          rejection of claims 1 to 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in light of               
          the holding in In re Steele, 305 F.2d 859, 862, 134 USPQ 292,               
          295 (CCPA 1962).  This reversal of the examiner's rejection is              
          based only on the procedural ground relating to the                         
          indefiniteness of these claims and therefore is not a reversal              
          based on the merits of the rejection.                                       


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claims 1 to 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed and a new                  
          rejection of claims 1 to 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                   
          paragraph, has been added pursuant to provisions of 37 CFR §                
          1.196(b).                                                                   


               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53131, 53197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203                
          Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR §                   







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007