THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DIETER PAPENHAGEN
and MANFRED LOCHLE
_____________
Appeal No. 99-1752
Application 08/632,9551
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 9, all of the claims in the application. In the
answer (page 2), the examiner indicates that finally rejected
1Application for patent filed April 16, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007