Appeal No. 1999-1764
Application No. 08/827,544
through 8, all of the claims remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a mounting assembly.
An understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which appears in the
APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 19).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Wilson 4,813,641 Mar. 21, 1989
Wolterstorff, Jr. 4,825,515 May 2,
1989
Irizarry 5,649,634 Jul. 22, 1997
(filed Nov. 13, 1995)
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Wilson in view of
Wolterstorff.
Claims 6 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Wilson in view of
Wolterstorff, as applied to claims 1 through 5, further in
view of Irizarry.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007