THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCIS GABRIEL and DAVID MEERMANS
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1991
Application No. 08/611,7251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, NASE and
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1, 3 to 10 and 12 to 23, as amended subsequent to
the final rejection. These claims constitute all of the
claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed March 6, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007