THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRIAN S. HONECK and COLIN R. SMIDSTRA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2032
Application No. 08/661,3031
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8, 9, 11 to 19, 21 to 26, 28 to 33
and 35 to 39. Claims 6, 7, 10, 20, 27 and 34, the remaining2
1Application for patent filed June 13, 1996.
2While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment
after final rejection to claims 2 and 22 (Paper No. 9, filed
September 21, 1998), we note that this amendment has not been
clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007