Ex parte HONECK et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-2032                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/661,303                                                  


          rejection, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 15,                   
          mailed February 22, 1999) for the examiner's complete                       
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper              
          No. 14, filed December 30, 1998) for the appellants' arguments              
          thereagainst.                                                               


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                 
          careful consideration to the appellants' specification and                  
          claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the                     
          respective positions articulated by the appellants and the                  
          examiner.  Upon evaluation of all the evidence before us, it                
          is our conclusion that the evidence adduced by the examiner is              
          insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness                 
          with respect to the claims under appeal.  Accordingly, we will              
          not sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8, 9,                
          11 to 19, 21 to 26, 28 to 33 and 35 to 39 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103.  Our reasoning for this determination follows.                         


               In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner                
          bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007