Appeal No. 1999-2092 Page 17 Application No. 08/798,718 of the polygonal bag) produces unexpected results. Therefore, we are of the opinion that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellant's invention to have Salvadori's preformed tear seam 46 occupy the greater portion of the length of one side of the polygonal bag 10. Accordingly, the examiner's rejection of claim 47 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is sustained. Claim 51 We will not sustain the rejection of claim 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Claim 51 adds to parent claim 42 the limitation that the walls are "secured together over all the area between said opposite longitudinal edges of said margin." The examiner ascertained (final rejection, p. 4) that Salvadori discloses the claimed invention except for the walls of the bag being secured together over all the area betweenPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007