Ex parte BOCHET - Page 20




                 Appeal No. 1999-2092                                                                                    Page 20                        
                 Application No. 08/798,718                                                                                                             


                 modifying a reference, standing alone, is not "evidence."                                                                              
                 E.g., McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 995 F.2d 1576,                                                                          
                 1578, 27 USPQ2d 1129, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Sichert,                                                                            
                 566 F.2d 1154, 1164, 196 USPQ 209, 217 (CCPA 1977).  See also                                                                          
                 In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 999, 50 USPQ2d 1614, 1617 (Fed.                                                                         
                 Cir. 1999).  In this case, the examiner has not presented                                                                              
                 sufficient evidence establishing the obviousness of the                                                                                
                 subject matter of claim 51.                                                                                                            


                          For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the                                                                          
                 examiner to reject claim 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                         


                 Claims 44, 46 and 48 to 50                                                                                                             
                          In accordance with the appellant's Grouping of Claims  and                                     4                              
                 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claims 44, 46 and 48 to 50 fall with                                                                             
                 claims 42 and 47.  Thus, it follows that the decision of the                                                                           
                 examiner to reject claims 44, 46 and 48 to 50 is also                                                                                  
                 affirmed.                                                                                                                              




                          4See pages 3-4 of the appellant's brief.                                                                                      







Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007