Appeal No. 1999-2094 Page 14 Application No. 08/517,198 convenient loading and unloading and thus fall at least into the latter category of the Wood test, and logically would have commended itself to an artisan's attention in considering the appellant's problem. Thus, we conclude that both Vanzant and Will are analogous art. For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. Claims 15-20 The decision of the examiner to reject claims 15 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is also affirmed since the appellant has not challenged this rejection with any reasonable specificity, thereby allowing dependent claims 15 through 20 to fall with independent claim 14 (see In re Nielson, 816 F.2d 1567, 1572, 2 USPQ2d 1525, 1528 (Fed. Cir. 1987).Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007