Appeal No. 1999-2130 Page 7 Application No. 08/813,307 into the heel of a shoe and then perform a weight-training exercise while the insert is present therein, as is required by claim 1, other than the hindsight afforded one who first viewed the appellant’s disclosure. This being the case, the prior art applied by the examiner fails to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007