Interference No. 103,939
______________
Patent Interference No. 103,939
______________
Before METZ, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.640
Background
The Administrative Patent Judge is in receipt of a
response by junior party Salzman et al. to the Order to Show
Cause mailed September 29, 1998. The junior party states that
the Order to Show Cause should be limited to claims 1-4,
designated as corresponding to count 1 and claims 5-12,
designated as corresponding to count 2. This is correct.
2(...continued)
is a continuation of Application 07/380,706, filed July 13,
1989, abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/237,287, filed August 26, 1988, abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/994,721, filed December
22, 1992, abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/719,098, filed June 20, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,174,290, issued December 29, 1992; which is a continuation
of Application 07/496,186, filed March 20, 1990, abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/380,704, filed July
13, 1989, abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/237,286, filed August 26, 1988, abandoned.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007