Interference No. 103,939
The original Fiddian-Green motion only ran to claims 1-12,
and, in point of fact, Salzman et al. claims 13-16 are outside
the subject matter of the interference.
Accordingly, the following judgment specifying only
claims 1 through 12 is entered.
Judgment
Judgment in Interference No. 103, 939 is hereby
entered in favor of Richard Fiddian-Green, the senior party.
Richard Fiddian-Green is entitled to a patent containing
claims 54 through 57, which correspond to count 1 in
interference, and claims 58 through 73, which correspond to
count 2 in interference. Judgment is entered against Andrew
L. Salzman, Mitchell P. Fink, and Jeffrey B. Kane, the junior
party. Andrew L. Salzman, Mitchell P. Fink, and Jeffrey B.
Kane are not entitled to their patent claims 1 through 4,
which claims correspond to count 1 in interference, and claims
5 through 12, which claims correspond to count 2 in
interference.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007