Interference No. 103,729
Griggs v. Rose
Alvin Blum, has been received. (Paper No. 13). Despite the3
caption on the paper’s top left hand corner indicating that
the paper is filed by junior party’s counsel for the junior
party, it is apparent that it is the senior party, Howard
Rose, who is conceding priority, based on the signatures on
the paper.
The paper states that the senior party Howard Rose
consents to entry of adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662.
Accordingly, based on the concession of priority and consent
to entry of adverse judgment, it is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the
sole count is awarded in favor of junior party Griggs and
against senior party Rose;
ORDERED that Howard Rose is not entitled to his patent
claims 1-17 which correspond to the count;
ORDERED that on this record, Eugene S. Griggs, Jr., and
Joanne Hayes are entitled to their application claims 1-6, 8-
9, 11, 13-18, 21-26, and 29-31, which correspond to the count;
and
3The paper is not accompanied by any certificate of
service.
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007