Interference No. 103,729 Griggs v. Rose FURTHER ORDERED that on this record, Eugene S. Griggs, Jr., and Joanne Hayes are not entitled to their application claims 19-20 and 27-28, even though they correspond to the count, because these claims have been indicated by the examiner as unpatentable. Richard E. Schafer ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS Jameson Lee ) AND Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) Richard Torczon ) Administrative Patent Judge) - 3 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007