THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Trial Section Merits Panel
BOX INTERFERENCE
WASHINGTON DC 20231
Paper No. 23
Telephone: 703-308-9797
Facsimile: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
WILLIAM J. RUTTER
and HOWARD M. GOODMAN
(4,935,235 and 5,196,194),
Junior Party,
v.
KENNETH MURRAY
(08/472,301, 08/480,118,
and 08/486,592),
Senior Party.
_______________
Interference No. 104,031
_______________
Before SCHAFER, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
(PURSUANT TO 37 CFR §§ 1.640 AND 1.659(c))
INTRODUCTION
The parties contend that there exists no interference-in-
fact between the subject matter of the claims involved in the
35 U.S.C. § 135(c) Notice: Failure to file a copy of any agreement regarding the
termination of this proceeding may render the agreement and any resulting patents
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007