Interference No. 104,272 Paper No. 56
Lerner v. Lerner v. Winter Page 5
ORDER
Upon consideration of the record of this interference, it
is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 is
awarded against senior party Winter;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party Winter is not entitled
to a patent containing claims 49 and 53-56 of Winter's
08/332,046 application, which correspond to count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,
junior party Lerner and Sorge is entitled to a patent
containing claims 17-22, 24-26, and 29-32 of their 07/941,761
application, which correspond to count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,
junior party Lerner, Sorge, Riechman, and Winter is entitled
to a patent containing claims 32-37, 39-41, 44, 45, 47-51 ,
53-55, 58-67, 70-76, 78-86, and 89-97 of their 07/941,762
application, which correspond to count 1;
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007