Interference No. 104,372
Winker v. Abileah
1. John J. Deinken, Esq., counsel for junior party
Winker;
2. Joseph A. Rhoa, Esq., counsel for senior party
Abileah; and
3 Jameson Lee, Administrative Patent Judge (APJ).
F. Discussion--third conference call
The parties advised the APJ that the actions proposed by
the APJ are agreeable to the parties. In particular, the
parties represented that the filing by Winker of a reissue
application all of which claims require the first deposited
thin-film compensator layer to be a positively birefringent O-
plate layer will operate as a request for entry of adverse
judgment against Winker as to the subject matter of a modified
count which requires each of the first and second deposited
thin-film layer to be selected from the group consisting of
(i) a positively birefringent A-plate compensator layer, and
(ii) a negatively birefringent C-plate compensator layer.
G. On November 10, 1999, the APJ re-declared the
interference (Paper No. 18) to change the count to the
following:
A compensator for a liquid crystal display
comprising:
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007