Appeal No. 96-3603 Page 6
Application No. 08/243,839
Fundamentally, we disagree with Appellant's construction
of his claim. Appellant urges that
the use of a diode that conducts in a given
direction neither teaches nor suggests the use of a
fuse that will conduct in neither direction upon the
occurrence of an overcurrent condition but that will
conduct in either direction prior to such an event.
(Paper No. 19 at 2.) Assuming, arguendo, the truth of that
statement, it does not represent the entire scope of the
subject matter that Appellant has claimed.
DECISION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007