THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RONALD E. CHRISTENSON
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0006
Application No. 08/868,480
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 3, 5, 6, 12, 15, 26, 31 to 33, 36, 39, 40
and 46, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.1
1Claims 8 and 9 were canceled subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007