Ex parte CHRISTENSON - Page 9

          Appeal No. 2000-0006                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 08/868,480                                                  

          the applied prior art and fail to see any suggestion or                     
          motivation in the applied prior art for a person having                     
          ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made                
          to have modified Christenson by the teachings of the Tweedie                
          as set forth by the examiner in the rejection under appeal.                 
          In our view, the only suggestion for so modifying Christenson               
          in the manner proposed by the examiner                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007