Appeal No. 2000-0006 Page 9 Application No. 08/868,480 the applied prior art and fail to see any suggestion or motivation in the applied prior art for a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified Christenson by the teachings of the Tweedie as set forth by the examiner in the rejection under appeal. In our view, the only suggestion for so modifying Christenson in the manner proposed by the examinerPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007