Ex parte BAIL - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0007                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/586,919                                                  


               Claims 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103 as               
          being unpatentable over Suyama in view of Matsuzaki.                        


               Claims 13 to 15, 17, 20 and 24 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over Pirre in view of                 
          Suyama.                                                                     


               Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103 as being                
          unpatentable over Pirre in view of Suyama as applied to claim               
          13 above, and further in view of Ohba.                                      


               Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103 as being                
          unpatentable over Pirre in view of Suyama as applied to claim               
          13 above, and further in view of Farque.                                    


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                 
          rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper                 
          No. 9, mailed November 24, 1998) and the answer (Paper No. 12,              
          mailed July 7, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning in               
          support of the rejections, and to the brief (Paper No. 11,                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007