Ex parte MUELLER et al. - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 29              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
              Ex parte GEROLD MUELLER, PETER WOLF, and HEINZ VEITINGER                
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0105                                  
                               Application 08/573,247                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CALVERT, COHEN, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
              This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 23                 
          to 25, all the claims remaining in the application.                         
              The appealed claims are drawn to a method of tightening a               
          screw connection, using an impact screwdriver; they differ in               
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007