Appeal No. 2000-0105 Application No. 08/573,247 24, “a profile of an induced armature voltage . . . electric drive motor” refers to the voltage profile (as at “t ” in ind Fig. 2c) when no current is flowing through the motor, as shown in Fig. 2b; this voltage “profile” varies as shown for the three different “t ” time periods of Fig. 2c. ind However, we do not consider claim 25's expression “a profile of a current of said variable-speed electric drive motor” to be definite. In the first place, this expression does not define which current of the motor is being claimed, nor does it define when the profile of the current is to be measured (unlike the profile recited in claim 24). Secondly, this expression becomes even more indefinite if one attempts to read it in light of the specification, because as shown in Fig. 2b, the motor current I is zero during the impulses, and mot thus has no “profile” at those times. On page 6 of the specification, lines 6 to 13, appellants state that emitted moment M can be calculated from I , but itab mot is not clear how this can be done when the motor current is zero during the time that there is an emitted moment (compare Figs. 2b and 2d). The rejection of claims 23 to 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007