THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN M. SANDERS
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0224
Application No. 29/081,424
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McQUADE, OWENS, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of the following design
claim:1
The ornamental design of an LIQUID AND SEDIMENT COLLECTOR as shown and
described.
1While the copy of the appealed claim in the appendix to the appellant's brief is substantially correct, it
does differ from the actual claim of record in that the use of capitalization in the claim of record has been omitted in
the copy in the appendix and in that "an" in the record claim appears as "a" in the copy in the appendix.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007