Ex parte MORRIS - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                         publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.              
                                                                      Paper No. 15           
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                            
                                        ____________                                         
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                               
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                       
                                        ____________                                         
                                Ex parte SHANNON S. MORRIS                                   
                                        ____________                                         

                                    Appeal No. 2000-0293                                     
                                Application No. 08/766,862                                   
                                        ____________                                         
                                          ON BRIEF                                           
                                        ____________                                         

          Before FRANKFORT, GONZALES, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges             
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                             


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                       
          rejection of claims 1 through 17, which are all of the claims pending              
          in this application.                                                               
                The appellant's invention relates to a jewelry organizer.  An                
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of                    
          exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellant's                
          brief.                                                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007