The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DON L. BIERLY ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0487 Application No. 08/856,228 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 7 to 9, 11, 12, 14, 15 and 20. Claim 2 to 6 and 13 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. Claims 10 and 16 to 19 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claim 1 has been canceled. We AFFIRM-IN-PART.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007