Ex parte HUGGINS et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 17           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      

                  Ex parte MICHAEL J. HUGGINS, JOSEPH D. REYNOLDS,                    
                       DAVID L. WADAS and SHARON L. GUALTIERI                         
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-0502                                  
                             Application No. 08/890,438                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, COHEN, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          21 to 26, all the claims remaining in the application.                      
               The appealed claims are drawn to a change-gear                         
          transmission system and a microprocessor-based system                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007